Someone whom I admire greatly, though I have never met her, wrote a wonderful column a while back. It was emailed to me recently, and I’d like to bring it to readers’ attention. She describes an approach to educating dogs that she calls “Non-Training.” I’ve called this “Cognitive” dog training.
Whatever you call it, the idea is the same: Treat the dog as a partner and student, not as a robot who must obey.
It is a positive, motivation-based approach to teaching dogs that relies on their intelligence and problem-solving ability — not rote memorization of specific, inflexible responses to commands barked at them by an “alpha” human.
It starts with giving dogs choices. Teaching dogs a simple “yes” or “no” response is pretty easy. You can use your hands or ask the dog to do a different response, such as raise a paw or nose your knee. It’s up to you (and your dog) what response works. But once the dog gets the concept of a choice, the sky is the limit.
You can ask your dog whether she wants to go out, wants water, is hungry (use caution if you have a Lab or a golden!), wants the ball or the tug toy, wants a walk or a ball game, wants to rest, is hurting somewhere … Really, as in so many areas of our relationships with dogs, the limitations are imposed by our lack of imagination, not the dogs’ lack of ability or willingness.
Cognitive training goes beyond simple choices, though. It is about teaching dogs to think and solve problems, rather than waiting for us to tell them what to do. It is about shared goals, rather than humans ordering dogs around. It is a dramatic re-imagining of the human-dog partnership. It requires letting go, once and for all, of the idea that dogs “have to” obey humans, just because we have thumbs, or that they do stuff for us out of unconditional love.
A relationship with a dog is just that: A relationship. It takes work, mutual respect, a two-way avenue of communication that acknowledges what each contributes and what each needs from the other.
I won’t go so far as to say that it is or should be a completely equal relationship. Sometimes — often — the human gets to make the decisions. Much as some people loathe the comparison, it is like parenting in that way. The adult human is in charge, but that doesn’t mean there’s no room to respect and encourage the dog’s (child’s) individuality, allow for expression of preferences, and allow the dog to make choices when appropriate.
I encourage you to read the column, “Teaching Your Dog to Say Yes or No: The Art of Non-Training.”
4 thoughts on “It’s Teaching, Not Training”
[…] this blog to tell you over several years — pay attention to your dog’s communication, collaborate with your dog, and have a […]
The whole “Dog Trainer” puzzles me because, as you note, it is teaching and not training. For the purists, it is the dog owner that is generally getting the tutoring by the “trainer” and not the dog. I think that profession should perhaps have a superficial make-over to bring it into the current times! Dog Owner Guide (short forms to D.O.G. nicely!)
I like it … but then there are the folks who object to the idea of “owning? dogs. Dog Guardian Guide or Dog Parent Guide or Dog Team Guide … none of which have that catchy acronym.
I agree Pam, but I started with the acronym and worked backwards…. that’s the best I could come up with! 🙂